Mitigating Risk in Healthcare: Learning from Bad Outcomes

A blue sign that says incidents & adverse events near misses and unsafe conditions

Mitigating Risk in Healthcare: Learning from Bad Outcomes

Adverse events include a variety of unintended outcomes that cause patient’s harm. “Every year, millions of Medicare patients experience adverse events and temporary harm events as a result of medical care or in a health care setting.” (OIG, 2023). In such cases, patients may incur prolonged hospitalization/treatment and permanent harm. Patient death is also associated with adverse outcomes. When patient safety is compromised, it is up to the organization to conduct a comprehensive investigation to determine how the event occurred. If concerns are not addressed, the probability of the event reoccurring is highly likely.

Button

Risk Mitigation Strategies

Although hospitals strive to ensure they have a comprehensive Quality Assure Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program, there are several considerations to ensure that such programs are effective. To have a state-of-the-art electronic reporting program is simply not enough. It is important to ensure that that the following elements are in place:

Button

Establishing a culture of safety. Empowering employees to report concerns before they lead to adverse events.
Educating healthcare personnel on how to report risks or concerns.
Following up immediately on events that are reported.
Conducting a root cause analysis or gap analysis to evaluate events preceding an adverse outcome. Findings should be communicated as appropriate to prevent recurrence.
Performance Improvement (PI) measures should be considered using a multidisciplinary approach. Be sure to educate team members on new PI initiatives.
Safety measures should be implemented without delay.
Data collection and ongoing monitoring are critical to ensure that performance measures are effective. In the event that safety measures are not working well, revaluation is required, and new improvement strategies should be considered.
Near-miss events should also be reported and monitored. Establishing or re-establishing standard operating procedures may be necessary to prevent patient harm.

“A coordinated team approach where everyone is on the same team and empowered to express their concerns irrespective of "rank," and members are knowledgeable about their duties, offers the best chance for successful risk mitigation” (McGowan, et al 2023). Establishing and setting the tone for safe culture in healthcare settings is a must. Ongoing training on quality initiatives and process improvement is necessary to promote safe culture. Employees who do not “buy in” may also have a negative impact on their peer’s willingness to report concerns. A leadership team that fosters accountability, teamwork and transparency will have a positive impact on employee engagement and satisfaction.

There is no time like the present to take a closer look at your organization’s risk mitigation strategies. Are you looking for expert guidance on QAPI Program enhancement or Risk Mitigation strategies? HCE Global offers specialized consulting services to help your facility navigate regulatory challenges and achieve operational excellence.

Our experts understand the challenges that all healthcare facilities are facing today. Using a customizable approach, we will help you navigate through even the toughest of challenges.

Whether you are in need of QAPI assistance, mock surveys, leadership training, corrective action plans or ongoing routine support services, we can help!

We pride ourselves on helping our clients achieve and maintain a status of excellence in the healthcare industry.

Be sure to browse Our Website for a full list of services we provide.

References:

McGowan J, Wojahn A, Nicolini JR. Risk Management Event Evaluation and Responsibilities. [Updated 2023 Aug 23]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK559326, https://oig.hhs.gov/reports/featured/adverse-events

< Older Post

Newer Post >

Woman sitting at a desk, holding her shoulder while working on a laptop in a bright room.

Safe Patient Handling, Mobility, and Workplace Safety: Merging OSHA Mandates with CMS Quality Outcomes

June 4, 2026

OSHA's General Duty Clause and Ergonomic Risks Under Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the General Duty Clause), healthcare employers are legally required to provide a work environment free from recognized hazards that cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Manual patient lifting, transferring, and repositioning represent significant ergonomic hazards. OSHA actively inspects healthcare systems for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and mandates that hospitals implement engineered control solutions, such as ceiling lifts, sit-to-stand devices, and friction-reducing slide sheets.

Mitigating Electrical and Fire Risks in High-Acuity Care: NFPA 99 & Accrediting Body Imperatives

May 5, 2026

The Technical Baseline: NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code NFPA 99 (2012 Edition, as mandated by CMS) establishes risk-based categories for electrical and gas systems based on the risk to patients. Category 1 spaces are those where procedures are performed that could result in major injury or death if utility systems fail. Under Chapter 6 (Electrical Systems), facilities must maintain isolated power systems (IPS) and line isolation monitors (LIM) in wet procedure locations to protect patients against electrical shock. Survey Vulnerabilities: CIHQ and Joint Commission Directives During surveys, both TJC and CIHQ closely inspect the testing logs for these specialized electrical environments. TJC Standard EC.02.05.01 requires facilities to manage utility risks, specifically focusing on the routine inspection of ground- fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) and the regular calibration of LIM alarms. CIHQ surveyors frequently evaluate surgical staff on their understanding of the LIM panel: if an alarm sounds, do clinicians know that it signifies a critical loss of electrical isolation that could cause patient harm if a second fault occurs? OSHA 29 CFR § 1910 Subpart S Alignment While NFPA 99 protects the patient, OSHA Subpart S (Electrical Safety) safeguards the clinical staff operating the machinery. Employers must ensure all electrical medical devices are free from recognized hazards. Exposed wiring, unapproved extension cords, or failing to lock out/tag out malfunctioning medical hardware violates OSHA standards and places both employees and patients at immediate risk.

Red fire alarm box on a white hallway wall with a long corridor in the background

The Intersection of Clinical Quality & Environment of Care: Aligning CMS, AOs, and NFPA 101

April 4, 2026

CMS Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and the Unified Focus The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) establishes the baseline for safety through the Conditions of Participation (CoPs). Under 42 CFR § 482.41 (Physical Environment), hospitals must ensure that the physical plant is constructed, arranged, and maintained to secure the safety of patients. CMS holds leadership strictly accountable for ensuring that life safety deficiencies do not interfere with clinical intervention. When a surveyor enters a facility, they cross- reference the clinical patient logs with facility maintenance schedules to ensure environment-driven risks—such as positive/negative pressure room failures—did not impact immunosuppressed patients. Accrediting Bodies: CIHQ, Joint Commission and Other Aos’ Interventions Accrediting organizations like The Joint Commission (TJC) and the Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ) act as the enforcement arms for CMS via deemed status. TJC’s Environment of Care (EC) and Life Safety (LS) chapters explicitly detail how physical space directly impacts clinical delivery. For instance, TJC Standard EC.02.03.05 requires hospitals to maintain and test fire protection and suppression systems, mapping directly back to Life Safety Code compliance. Simultaneously, CIHQ’s structural surveys place massive emphasis on a unified environment. CIHQ approaches physical plant standards as a direct extension of standard clinical operations. They emphasize that blocked egress corridors or improperly stored medical equipment don't just constitute technical facility violations; they are direct barriers to rapid code-blue response and emergency patient evacuations.