Stumped on New Year's Resolution For Your Organization...

Try Evaluating Your Current QAPI Program

December 2022

By Jody Randall MSN, RN, CIC, HACP-CMS, HACP-PE

CEO and Founder

As we approach the end of the year, our experts here at HCE thought it would be a good time to look at performance improvement initiatives within healthcare organizations. With the day-to-day operational struggles that healthcare organizations are facing today, we have identified through surveillance that it is not uncommon for performance improvement projects to have taken a back seat to more pressing issues.


If your healthcare facility participates in Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) programs, then your facility must be able to demonstrate that it has a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program in place. There are several criteria that must be met for an organization to demonstrate that it meets § 482.21 Condition of participation: Quality assessment and performance improvement program requirements.


Now is a great time to revisit your organization’s program to ensure that focus has been regained on all matters related to patient safety.


Here are a few items to consider to refresh or jump start an effective and compliant QAPI Program:

 

  • Governing Boards should ensure that the scope of its program is facility-wide. They should also be prepared to allocate resources as needed for these programs. The Governing Board should approve the number of projects that will be implemented as well as determine the frequency of data collection. Clear expectations of program requirements should also be communicated to the organization’s respective team members. 


  • The scope of an effective program should include criteria focused on reduction of medical errors and improving outcomes. Performance improvement initiatives should include data that is measurable. This enables the organization to gain a clear understanding of whether the program is or is not effective. Evaluation is based on measurable outcomes being analyzed and improvement strategies identified to help improve the organization's performance.


  • It is important to consider when evaluating organizational performance to include contract services. Contracted service providers should be integrated into Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement Programs. Organizations that do not incorporate contract services into their QAPI Programs would not meet the requirements of the QAPI standard according to CMS Conditions of Participation.

 

CMS offers the following tools to help organizations create a solid foundation for developing a success QAPI Program:

QAPI Process Tool

QAPI at a glance

Social Media Healthcare Facility Fail

While understanding what it takes to develop a success QAPI Program for your facility is critical, it is not enough to ensure the success of the program itself. As facility-wide performance improvement projects are identified, approved, and analyzed, they are sure to be ineffective in the absence of a culture that holds safety in the highest regard.

Establishing a culture of high reliability is another key component towards achieving organizational performance improvement goals and reducing medical errors. Team members who feel safe to speak out about concerns will help to shed light on safety issues that may otherwise not be brought forward. Educating, empowering, and supporting healthcare personnel is a must. Without establishing a culture of trust, you cannot expect to be successful in improving performance and reducing risk within an organization.


Aside from the immediate metrics being analyzed, a successful QAPI Program will reap additional benefits for organizations who are committed to these facility-wide safety-driven programs. One consideration for improving patient outcomes is that it instills confidence in patients, personnel, communities and partnering organizations. Another consideration is reduction and elimination of incidences of patient harm. There are financial incentives for improved performance outcomes that are vital to maintaining an organization's financial health.


Finally, when an organization supports safe culture, there is a greater likelihood that they will not only attract talented healthcare professionals to join their team but will be able retain them on staff as well eliminating high turnover rates.


While there are many more advantages that can be named, we have highlighted those that we feel are a win-win for all. Take a few minutes to dust off your organizations last QAPI and evaluate if it is well understood and has proven to be effective.


Now is a great time as we approach 2023 to hit the refresh button and re-vitalize your organization’s existing, and potentially, outdated program.


From all of us here at HCE, we would like to say Happy Holidays and stay safe. 


References:

https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CFR-2018-title42-vol5/xml/CFR-2018-title42-vol5-sec482-21.xml

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/42/482.21


HCE is Here to Help
Healthcare Consulting Experts LLC was built based upon our understanding of the challenges that all healthcare facilities are facing today. Healthcare professionals strive to deliver the best possible care to all patients. We can help your facility through the difficult times and put you back on track to a less stressful tomorrow.


Don’t take chances! Our experts can assist with regulatory compliance requirements for whether you are building a new, state of the art project or renovating an existing structure. Be sure to visit Our Website   to see a full list of the services that we provide. Contact us today at +1 (800) 813-7117 for a free initial consultation.


Please join us by clicking on any of the icons below to leave a comment or for more informati on and updates:

Healthcare Consulting Experts LLC
Woman sitting at a desk, holding her shoulder while working on a laptop in a bright room.

Safe Patient Handling, Mobility, and Workplace Safety: Merging OSHA Mandates with CMS Quality Outcomes

June 4, 2026
OSHA's General Duty Clause and Ergonomic Risks Under Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act (the General Duty Clause), healthcare employers are legally required to provide a work environment free from recognized hazards that cause or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm. Manual patient lifting, transferring, and repositioning represent significant ergonomic hazards. OSHA actively inspects healthcare systems for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) and mandates that hospitals implement engineered control solutions, such as ceiling lifts, sit-to-stand devices, and friction-reducing slide sheets.

Mitigating Electrical and Fire Risks in High-Acuity Care: NFPA 99 & Accrediting Body Imperatives

May 5, 2026
The Technical Baseline: NFPA 99 Health Care Facilities Code NFPA 99 (2012 Edition, as mandated by CMS) establishes risk-based categories for electrical and gas systems based on the risk to patients. Category 1 spaces are those where procedures are performed that could result in major injury or death if utility systems fail. Under Chapter 6 (Electrical Systems), facilities must maintain isolated power systems (IPS) and line isolation monitors (LIM) in wet procedure locations to protect patients against electrical shock.  Survey Vulnerabilities: CIHQ and Joint Commission Directives During surveys, both TJC and CIHQ closely inspect the testing logs for these specialized electrical environments. TJC Standard EC.02.05.01 requires facilities to manage utility risks, specifically focusing on the routine inspection of ground- fault circuit interrupters (GFCIs) and the regular calibration of LIM alarms. CIHQ surveyors frequently evaluate surgical staff on their understanding of the LIM panel: if an alarm sounds, do clinicians know that it signifies a critical loss of electrical isolation that could cause patient harm if a second fault occurs? OSHA 29 CFR § 1910 Subpart S Alignment While NFPA 99 protects the patient, OSHA Subpart S (Electrical Safety) safeguards the clinical staff operating the machinery. Employers must ensure all electrical medical devices are free from recognized hazards. Exposed wiring, unapproved extension cords, or failing to lock out/tag out malfunctioning medical hardware violates OSHA standards and places both employees and patients at immediate risk.
Red fire alarm box on a white hallway wall with a long corridor in the background

The Intersection of Clinical Quality & Environment of Care: Aligning CMS, AOs, and NFPA 101

April 4, 2026
CMS Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and the Unified Focus The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) establishes the baseline for safety through the Conditions of Participation (CoPs). Under 42 CFR § 482.41 (Physical Environment), hospitals must ensure that the physical plant is constructed, arranged, and maintained to secure the safety of patients. CMS holds leadership strictly accountable for ensuring that life safety deficiencies do not interfere with clinical intervention. When a surveyor enters a facility, they cross- reference the clinical patient logs with facility maintenance schedules to ensure environment-driven risks—such as positive/negative pressure room failures—did not impact immunosuppressed patients. Accrediting Bodies: CIHQ, Joint Commission and Other Aos’ Interventions Accrediting organizations like The Joint Commission (TJC) and the Center for Improvement in Healthcare Quality (CIHQ) act as the enforcement arms for CMS via deemed status. TJC’s Environment of Care (EC) and Life Safety (LS) chapters explicitly detail how physical space directly impacts clinical delivery. For instance, TJC Standard EC.02.03.05 requires hospitals to maintain and test fire protection and suppression systems, mapping directly back to Life Safety Code compliance. Simultaneously, CIHQ’s structural surveys place massive emphasis on a unified environment. CIHQ approaches physical plant standards as a direct extension of standard clinical operations. They emphasize that blocked egress corridors or improperly stored medical equipment don't just constitute technical facility violations; they are direct barriers to rapid code-blue response and emergency patient evacuations.